Why Twitter Matters (And Makes Me Money) – And Why So Many Miss It

by Paul Colligan on June 22, 2009

I read with fascination a piece by old friend, mentor and (business) model Armand Morin entitled “Has Twitter Doomed Their Monetization.” Read it – great stuff.

Armand is a smart guy – a crazy smart guy. His “Big Seminar” event not only started the whole Internet Marketing “Event” business but it continues to run strong as all other simply build on it. Big Seminar XIII should be a fascinating event – but I digress.

Armand’s article, in short, claims that Twitter’s biggest problem is that it isn’t a destination site. He stresses strong the point that YOU DON’T HAVE TO GO TO TWITTER TO USE TWITTER.

He’s right.

He’s dead on.

He couldn’t be more correct.

Armand has made millions (and millions) online in destination sites – a web 1.0 model where you get people to come to your domain to do something that makes you money – it’s the nuts and bolts of all things Internet Marketing but also commerce in general. I have nothing but respect for how well Armand has done doing just that.

Twitter has given us another option – and here’s why …

YOU DON’T HAVE TO GO TO TWITTER TO USE TWITTER

I market all day long on Twitter. The different ways I do that is another book in content but in short, because YOU DON’T HAVE TO GO TO TWITTER TO USE TWITTER, I don’t have to figure out ways to get my audience to visit my site to make money – I merely have to get them the information that makes me money.

Some get that information at Twitter.com. They click on through – awesome.

Others get it on their phone. They also click on through – good too!

Others click on through using one of the 8 zillion “Twitter programs.” I think the idea is a bit crazy – but their clicks are as good as anyone else’s.

And, oh yes, I track these clicks – they’re good – all good.

Is my clickthrough rate on a Tweet higher than an email? Nope!

Do I “tweet” a lot more times per day than I send out emails? Yep!

Is that “the best” strategy? Time will tell.

I’ve seen over 300 clicks from Twitter today so far that will generate cash for me. Twould I have bought these via PPC, they would have cost me a little over $500.

Twitter matters a lot.

Now, I know Armand’s piece was about Twitter’s monetization problems.

It’s actually even easier.

Twitter connects me with thousands of people who want to see my messages at the time, place, and device of their choosing. It doesn’t get better than that. I can use those message to generate a revenue stream so the second Twitter asks me to to pay, … I will.

If they want to offer me “premium” options that help me do what I’m doing better … I’ll pay.

And so will anyone who takes Twitter seriously.

That’s why she matters.

  • Great post about Twitter. I think Twitter has a different set of issues than just working out a method of monetizing their product. They have some growing pains ahead of them as they try to change and add in different aspects.

    Now - your article. Twitter is an excellent example of using traffic to generate income. It doesn't matter if the traffic comes from Twitter, email, Squid lens, Hubpages, Facebook or MySpace status updates, Digg, StumpleOn, etc etc etc :)

    They key is using them as tools. Just like we can use the TV for entertainment or business. It all depends on our perspective to it.

    Good article. I always like seeing someone show the benefits of Twitter. I get some traffic but not nearly the volume you do :) But give me time :) haha
  • A friend of mine gave me the link to your article. I am on Twitter but I obviously don't use it as much as I should. So Twitter does matter! I do not have anything to sell yet but soon I hope. It takes time and effort to establish a name and reputation, but well worth the rewards. And it's fun also. I will continue to check back and read your blog, as many others do.

    Thank you,
    Wayne
  • Twitter is not a go to site but is it or could it be a funnel to a go to site. If so then Yahoo, MSN or even Google would be interested. Google already has youtube which is a bigger search engine than Google so do they need Twitter. Yahoo could use it but would the have the business model and the UI to leverage it. MS could us it too but probably would not see how to integrate since the did not invent it and could not come up with a story to save face as why the didn't. So who is left that could leverage the traffic and name of Twitter (and has capital) or does the meteor continue to burn until the light goes out or it hits the ground?
    The value is in the movement of bits of information and that value is growing (Metcalf's Law) but how value translates to profit for the carrier versus the users remains unclear. So make hay before the light goes out.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: