New Media Expo 2008 Deconstructed Part 2
Posted on 1:39 pm by Paul ColliganRead this first post about “The Good” of New Media Expo 2008. I’ll follow this with “The Decision” in a few days.
Part 2 - The Bad
Funny enough, NME08’s definitive moment for me was a conversation with a “consultant” to Hollywood who had nothing about complaints about the event yet couldn’t spend the three hundred bucks to attend the sessions with meat. I realized during the conversation that he, and everyone else in this space, really only have three options:
- Get in now, early, and get the perpetual early bird worm that we’re all looking for.
- Wait for the bleeding edge types to take the first round of arrows in their backs.
- Complain, whine, moan that things aren’t perfect yet.
Options #1 and #2 are valid. Option #3 results in little less than my wanting to scream.
In short, Tim Bourquin threw a first-class show (like always) that my business will benefit from (like always). But, things with the show weren’t perfect and we need to deconstruct them here to make next year’s event even better - if there is next year’s event.
Tim Bourquin posted this one - “5 Reasons Why I’m Thinking About Quitting The Tradeshow Business” and, well, I can’t find fault in his thinking. He is up against a lot.
Michael Geoghegan (the Jimmy Stewart of Podcasting) writes of the lack of exhibitor growth over the last few years. He’s right. His “fix” we’ll examine in the final part of this series but, he is right, the exhibitors didn’t show up. Tim explained why in his piece - is this Tim’s problem, the vendor’s problem, or the problem of the tradeshow space?
Several speakers didn’t show up or canceled at the very last minute. It amazes me how anyone in a space still fighting for legitimacy didn’t (even attempt to) “make up for that” with the level of class Tim invited them to the show. Craziness happens, but … you can do better.
Several speakers gave the same exact speech as the year (or years before). If our message is we’re growing in some exciting ways - the least you can do is offer a new story. Yes, such a tiny percentage have heard the story so far that “it’s new to most of you” but for those old timers who did show up - we’d love some new content. Being at the front of a revolution is worth a new slide deck now and then.
Tim is right, doing an event is just more complicated than it needs to be any more. We saw that reflected in companies who arrive with half the impact they did in previous years and, gosh darn it, we saw that reflected in the companies who didn’t arrive this year.
But truly frustrating to me we some of the “pioneers” in this space unwilling to cut through all this mess and actually do something. Those who showed up figured out how to play the game (I’m mean come on, Leo Laporte broadcasting live - how much did that cost Stickam?) and for that I say thanks. For those who didn’t show up I’d like to suggest that there is a thin line between strategy and laziness. Sometimes, in short, doing the right thing takes a little effort.
I heard a lot of chat about the “problem” with this event was that it tried so hard not to be the very thing it was, The Podcast Expo 2008. Funny thing is, before I got on the plane I would have disagreed strongly - but now that it’s all over, I’m beginning to agree. More on that in the next piece.
So, in short, Tim is right, it was harder to pull this thing off than it should have been but … I think maybe a few of us could have tried harder.
This little media revolution is worth it. In those options listed above, I wonder how many have picked option #3 while telling themselves over an over again that they’re embraced #1 or #2. And whereas Vegas (or any other convention town) is a pain in the butt, we have ourselves as much to blame as anyone or anything else.
Sometimes revolutions aren’t easy. Actually, I think that’s textbook definition.
Thoughts?
Technorati Tags: new media expo 2008, podcast expo, tim bourquin, las vegas, stickam, leo laporte
Trackback uri
http://www.paulcolligan.com/2008/08/19/new-media-expo-2008-deconstructed-part-2/trackback/




5 Comments »
August 19, 2008
Steve Webb said:
I couldn’t have said it better, Paul.
As a bleeding-edge podcaster (first show: November, 2004), and having attended every NME (even before the term “new media” was in the title), I’ve seen a trend. From the second expo on, it seems as if the “It was better last year” crowd has gotten louder. I’m not sure exactly why that is, other than the human tendency to dislike change. And of course, the reasons you put forth would certainly play a part.
Reading Tim’s blog earlier today made me sad at the prospect that there may not be another NME. Can he bring together enough support in the trade show industry to make real changes in the areas he enumerated? I hope so, but there is a lot of inertia to overcome.
I’ve said it before in smaller venues, but let me say it here as well: Tim Bourquin is a class act all the way. For those who would like to criticize the NME or Tim personally, let’s see you do a better job. His motivation has always been to help move podcasting forward, and in my mind, he is an invaluable asset to our community.
To those speakers who failed to show: Shame on you. Unless there was a death in the family or something equally weighty, your responsibility was in Las Vegas.
August 19, 2008
Taylor Marek said:
Steve, I would have to agree with you.
Paul, excellent post. And Tim (and company), thanks for the first-class performance on your part. I enjoyed the Expo very much. First-time attender after 2 years of saving and wanting to go, yet never failed what I expected to see or hear. It was even better than my expectations….
Now for my 2 cents…
After reading Tim’s post this afternoon, it made me realize the difficulty in the tradeshow industry and how much more pushing has to be done to get anywhere. How a group of people need to stand up and take action to right some of these wrongs so that the barrier to entry isn’t impossibly hard.
Paul, thanks for reposting those 3 options. Hearing you say that at the breakfast we had made me think alot about this revolution.
And for those of you who skipped out on your speeches, I would have to agree with Steve on that part. Had I known there would have been a problem like that, I would have gladly thrown my hat in to be a speaker. Tim, is there a possibility to have backup speakers waiting in the event this happens? I would be more than happy to be a speaker or a backup speaker….
I might post my own thoughts about this on my blog, or talk about it in my next episode. I’m still in the process of documenting alot of what I heard and saw there…
In the meantime, keep up the great work Paul and Tim!
-Taylor
August 20, 2008
Kevin Hunt said:
Paul,
As a first-time attender I was pleased with the content - and price - of the New Media Expo. I’ve been to conferences in the last year that cost three times as much and didn’t provide as much insight for me as NME did. Plus, I’ll get the audio of the sessions I missed.
Sure I was disappointed that a couple speakers I wanted to see weren’t there, but my second choices in those timeslots were still interesting and appropriate for what I was there to learn.
I’d recommend NME to anyone who hasn’t been to it before, whether they’re a podcaster trying to make money, or podcasting for their corporate job.
-Kevin Hunt
August 20, 2008
New Media Expo 2008 - Thoughts and Reflections at My Own Reality (Pingback)
[…] NB for some other thoughts and reflections about the New Media Expo, check out some additional blog posts by Paul Colligan and Michael Geoghegan […]
August 20, 2008
New Media Expo ‘08: the buzz : Trade Show Social Media (Pingback)
[…] Paul Colligan has described the good and the bad ( New Media Expo 2008 Deconstructed Part 2) of the New Media Expo. Highlights: My business will be better as a result of this event. I have more tools and connections than ever as a result of NME08. I’m more sure than ever that this industry is right for me - no matter what we call it. I count many of you not just as business partners - but friends. […]