My Attempted Reverse Bully Pulpit Experiment Failed Miserably – My Fault

by Paul Colligan on January 31, 2008

In my blogging about Podango’s issues, I had this concept in my head of a reverse bully pulpit for specifics kinda approach.  Instead of reporting bad news, I’d report good news and do what I can to encourage people in our space to wonder what kind of great press they might get for doing great things.  There is so much "x sucks" in blogs, etc., I thought it would be fun to report what actually is doing well. 

I also thought that when you report something down and someone fixes it, you make a big deal about the fix.  

Well it hasn’t worked.  It hasn’t gotten the response I was hoping for.  People I respect aren’t reading from this what I was attempting to write.  If the people close enough to tell me aren’t reading this the way I hoped they would, I can only wonder what the rest of the world takes from these new media ramblings. 

So, from this point on, I’m not going to blog or tweet about specific issues I’m having with any technology other than my own.  At least, that’s the goal.

And, by the way, I think Premiumcast.com is a much better service now that we took my mug off the header.

If I forget this goal, someone gently remind me please (both the specific tech issues thing and the removal of my face from the Premiumcast header)?

Re Podango and the current issue, they’re aware of it, they’re on it, they’ll fix it.  For the record, it’s my problem that I’m having with their system and that’s the story.  They have a Blog where they will report their take on what’s going on.  You can frequent that for more – it’s probably much better written anyway.

I’ll continue to report Good News.  I can’t not do that.  I’ll just remain a bit distanced from it so the lines are a bit clearer.

    

  • The only change is "I’m not going to blog or tweet about specific issues I’m having with any technology" - you'll still get my thoughts on things - even stories of resolution (again, keeping the "good news" angel), but the accusation that someone fixed something only because this blog leaned on them has to go away.

    I want people to fix things for me because they need to be fixed, not because of a reverse bully pulpit.

    I'll also point and direct people towards other stories out there - but will keep a line of separation

    Paul
  • Kelly
    Paul --

    I find this particular post more of a problem than anything you said before. You mean we aren't going to get your take on technology you're using? (especially if you've been a big advocate of it in the past). For the purists out there complaining about your content, isn't that the whole purpose of a blog (and dare I say a podcasts)? -- to be transparent?

    We "have been" (past tense?) getting the straight scoop from someone who is in this stuff up to his eyeballs, and working to make the industry better for all of us... that is why I bother reading your posts (even when you seem to market products a bit often).

    You give us the low-down on what you like, dislike, etc. and we decide if you're whining to much, are too negative, or if we just don't care what you have to say. It's easy, I unsubscribe from your stuff and move on. I dump blogs and podcasts I'm subscribed to weekly (as well as trying out new ones).

    FWIW - I liked you input, I'm interested in how companies handle issues, with technology it's now if you'll have a problem, but when -- and how they get resolved.

    One man's opinion,
    Kelly

    PS - I went to check out "www.insidepodango.com", click on blog, and got an "error establishing a database connection"... classic! (all considering)
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: